By: Dr. Adnan Bouzan 

Democracy is one of the greatest political achievements that humanity has sought to realize, providing a framework for governance based on pluralism, rights, and freedoms. However, transitioning to democracy is not merely a political or legal decision that can be imposed overnight, especially in societies where a culture of violence and repression has been deeply entrenched for decades or even centuries. A sudden and rapid transition may not lead to freedom and stability; rather, it could open the door to chaos and destruction or reproduce authoritarianism in different forms.> Democracy has always been an aspiration for people throughout history, serving as a governance model that upholds the principles of freedom, justice, and political participation. From its origins in ancient Athens to its evolution in the modern era, democracy has been closely tied to societies' ambitions for more stable and just systems that allow citizens to express their opinions and participate in decision-making without fear or repression. However, achieving democracy has never been a smooth or immediate process. It is a long path filled with political, social, and economic challenges, particularly in societies that have experienced prolonged authoritarian rule or violent conflicts.

Transitioning from systems based on violence and repression to a democratic system is not limited to enacting laws or holding free elections; rather, it requires a fundamental transformation in political and societal culture. Repressive regimes do not merely subjugate individuals by force; they also reshape their consciousness, making authoritarianism part of the mental and behavioral structure of society. This is where the danger of sudden democratic transformation lies—it may face fierce resistance from forces that have benefited from authoritarianism. It may also lead to a political and security vacuum that is exploited by non-democratic groups seeking to impose their authority through other, potentially even harsher, means.

The experiences of many countries have shown that rapid democratic transformation without institutional and social preparation often leads to counterproductive results. We have witnessed how some revolutions aiming for democracy have descended into civil conflicts and how authoritarianism has returned in some states shortly after democratic transitions due to the absence of institutions capable of safeguarding the democratic process. This raises critical questions: Can a society immersed in violence transition to democracy without going through carefully planned transitional phases? And what are the necessary tools to ensure that the democratic dream does not turn into a nightmare of chaos or a return to authoritarianism in a new guise?

Addressing these questions requires a deep understanding of the nature of violent societies and the mechanisms through which a suitable environment for democratic transformation can be fostered, ensuring its sustainability and resilience against internal and external challenges.

1. The Challenge of Transitioning from Violence to Democracy

When violence is the primary tool for managing societies, any democratic transformation must consider the deep-rooted structure of this violence: How did it originate? Who fuels it? And what forces benefit from it? Political change without addressing these factors may either lead to state collapse or the rise of new forces that practice authoritarianism under a democratic guise.

In societies ruled by authoritarian elites who seized power through repression and force rather than competence or merit, individuals raised under these regimes may be unaware of their rights and incapable of practicing democracy effectively. These individuals may reject democracy not because they do not desire freedom, but because they have not learned how to exercise it or understand its true implications.

2. Forces That Hinder Democracy

Democratic transition in violent societies is not merely a matter of popular will; it is a struggle between forces seeking change and those fearing the loss of their power. These forces may include:

• Military and security institutions: which rely on repression and represent the greatest obstacle to any democratic transformation.

• Economic elites benefiting from corruption: who fear that democratic openness may lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth.

• Hardline ideological movements: that resist losing their influence to more open political forces.

• Armed groups and militias: that see violence as a means of maintaining their interests and fear that democracy may lead to their dissolution.

3. The Dangers of Sudden Democratic Transformation

Societies accustomed to violence do not transition smoothly into democracy. Historical experiences show that hasty and unplanned transformations can lead to one of three disastrous outcomes:

• Chaos and collapse: as witnessed in some Arab Spring countries, where the fall of authoritarian regimes led to internal conflicts rather than democratic stability, such as in Syria, Libya, and Yemen.

• The return of authoritarianism in different forms: where repressive forces regain power through new mechanisms, as seen in several military coups that followed democratic transitions.

• The rise of extremism and terrorism: where the absence of a central authority allows extremist groups to exploit the political vacuum, threatening any nascent democratic experiment.

4. How to Achieve a Successful Democratic Transition?

To ensure a successful and sustainable democratic transition, realistic strategies must be adopted, taking into account the nature of society, including:

• Gradual reform: Instead of rushing into chaotic democratization, a gradual approach should be taken to build strong institutions and enhance political awareness.

• Dismantling violence networks: through the restructuring of security and military institutions and ensuring that repressive elites do not control political decisions.

• Integrating marginalized groups: Democracy cannot succeed if it remains limited to elites; it must include all segments of society, especially those who have suffered from marginalization.

• Promoting a culture of democracy: through education, media, and political practices that reinforce dialogue and pluralism.

• Achieving transitional justice: To prevent democracy from becoming a mere reproduction of past injustices, accountability must be ensured without descending into revenge and chaos.

Conclusion

Attempting to transition a violence-ridden society into democracy suddenly can lead to entirely opposite results. Radical change without preparation may result in chaos or violent resistance from forces that built their power on violence. Individuals raised under authoritarian regimes, where they had no voice, will not become democratic citizens simply through legal changes; they require long-term intellectual and cultural rehabilitation.

Therefore, democratic transformation must be a well-thought-out process that avoids leaping into the unknown and constructs real alternatives to authoritarianism. Otherwise, authoritarianism will reproduce itself in new forms, leaving societies trapped in an endless cycle of repression and instability.

Add comment